Experts Say Biden Illegally Announced A New Constitutional “Amendment”

President Joe Biden’s final days in office spark controversy as he declares the Equal Rights Amendment the 28th Amendment to the Constitution.

But is he right?

At a Glance

  • Biden declares ERA as the 28th Amendment on his final Friday in office
  • Critics argue the move is an unconstitutional overreach of executive power
  • The ERA failed to meet ratification deadlines in the past
  • Concerns raised about potential unintended consequences of the amendment
  • Biden’s actions compared to dictatorial behavior by some observers

Biden’s Controversial Declaration

In a move that has ignited fierce debate, President Joe Biden declared the Equal Rights Amendment (ERA) as the 28th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution on his final Friday in office. This unexpected announcement has raised eyebrows across the political spectrum, with many questioning the legal validity and appropriateness of such a unilateral declaration.

“The 28th Amendment is the law of the land,” Biden said.

Oh, is it now?

The ERA, first introduced in 1972, aimed to guarantee equal legal rights for all American citizens regardless of sex. However, it failed to achieve ratification by the required number of states within both its original and extended deadlines, leaving its legal status in limbo for decades.

Legal and Constitutional Concerns

Critics argue that Biden’s declaration is legally dubious and potentially represents an overreach of executive authority. The process to amend the Constitution is clearly defined and requires either a convention of the states or resolutions passed by two-thirds of Congress and ratified by three-fourths of the states. Biden’s attempt to bypass this process has drawn sharp criticism from legal experts and conservative groups.

“Sir, this is not how the Constitution works,” Mollie Hemmingway said.

Short and simple. But true.

Supporters of the President’s move argue that the ERA is long overdue and that Biden is merely recognizing its validity. However, detractors point out that existing constitutional provisions and federal statutes already prohibit sex-based discrimination, questioning the necessity of this controversial declaration.

Conservative groups have also expressed concerns about potential unintended consequences of the ERA, such as implications for single-sex facilities and other gender-specific policies. These worries highlight the complex nature of constitutional amendments and the far-reaching effects they can have on society.

The President’s actions in his final days have been described by some as destructive and nonchalant. Critics, including public figures and social media users, have condemned Biden’s approach, likening it to dictatorial decrees. This comparison underscores the deep divisions and

Biden is just leaving a trail of chaos as he prepares to leave the White House, presumably in a desperate attempt to leave behind a legacy that doesn’t just include mass censorship, left-wing extremism, and corruption.