Mauritius faces social media blackout ahead of elections amid wiretapping scandal.
At a Glance
- Mauritius blocked access to social media platforms due to a wire-tapping scandal
- Secret recordings of politicians, journalists, and diplomats were leaked online
- The Prime Minister’s office cited national security risks for the social media ban
- Opposition leaders condemned the ban as a threat to fundamental rights
- The ban is set to last until November 11, a day after the national election
Government Imposes Social Media Ban
The island nation of Mauritius has plunged into political turmoil as the government imposed a sweeping ban on social media platforms ahead of the upcoming general election. This drastic measure comes in response to a wire-tapping scandal that has shaken the country’s political landscape and raised concerns about national security.
The Prime Minister’s office ordered internet service providers to block access to major social networks until November 11, one day after the election. This decision was prompted by the leak of secret recordings involving high-profile figures, including politicians, journalists, civil society members, and foreign diplomats.
Wiretapping Scandal Unfolds
At the center of this crisis is an account on TikTok named “Missie Moustass,” which has been releasing a series of damaging recordings. Despite attempts to block the account, it continues to publish new material, causing widespread public unrest and political instability.
“Following the publication of certain audio tracks on social media, there is a real risk that the national security and integrity of our Republic and our international partners may have been compromised,” the office of Prime Minister Pravind Kumar Jugnauth said.
The leaked recordings have implicated various officials in potentially compromising situations. Notable leaks include a police commissioner allegedly requesting the alteration of a forensic report and private calls involving the British High Commissioner.
Opposition Condemns Social Media Ban
The opposition has strongly criticized the government’s decision to block social media, viewing it as an infringement on fundamental rights and a threat to fair elections. Opposition leaders, who rely heavily on these platforms for communication with voters, have expressed their outrage at the ban.
“It’s shocking, revolting, and unacceptable. It’s a sign of panic,” Paul Berenger said.
Another opposition leader, Nando Bodha, echoed this sentiment, stating, “This is the last desperate act of a regime in disarray.” The opposition is considering legal action and has called for the Election Commission to intervene to ensure the fairness of the upcoming election.
Implications for Democracy and Free Speech
The social media ban in Mauritius raises significant questions about the balance between national security and freedom of expression. As Prime Minister Pravind Kumar Jugnauth seeks re-election, his administration’s handling of this crisis has become a focal point of criticism.
The unfolding situation in Mauritius serves as a stark reminder of the powerful role social media plays in modern political discourse and the challenges governments face in managing information flow during sensitive periods. As the election approaches, the international community will be watching closely to see how this island nation navigates these turbulent waters and maintains its democratic integrity.
