Florida’s proposed sales tax holiday on firearms has ignited fierce backlash, especially following a deadly shooting at Florida State University (FSU) that left two students dead and six others injured.
At a Glance
- Senate Bill 7034 proposes a sales tax exemption on firearms and ammunition from September to December
- Critics argue the bill could increase gun accessibility and violence
- The FSU shooting has intensified student opposition to the legislation
- Proponents say gun-free zones are riskier than armed citizenry
- Research on gun-free zones presents conflicting conclusions
Tax Holiday Amid Tragedy
Senate Bill 7034, backed by Florida Senate leadership, would create a four-month tax exemption on firearms and ammunition purchases, from September 8 through December 31, 2025. The bill is part of a $2.1 billion tax relief package endorsed by Governor Ron DeSantis and described as promoting a “Second Amendment Summer,” according to the Florida Phoenix.
The timing has drawn sharp criticism following the April 17 mass shooting on FSU’s campus. The attack left two students dead and six injured. The suspect, 20-year-old student Phoenix Ikner, was apprehended at the scene. As CBS News reports, the tragedy has amplified opposition to the bill among students and advocates calling for stricter gun control.
Watch CBS News’ report on the FSU shooting and ensuing debates at Florida State University shooting leaves 2 dead, 6 injured.
Student Opposition and National Reactions
Student groups at FSU argue that the tax holiday encourages gun purchases without addressing root causes of gun violence—most notably, mental health. Critics claim the legislation focuses on accessibility rather than safety and believe the bill could contribute to future tragedies, especially on college campuses.
Former President Donald Trump commented on the shooting and the legislation, saying, “These things are terrible. But the gun doesn’t do the shooting, the people do.” Trump’s remarks, reported by CBS News, emphasized his long-standing position against tighter gun regulations, reaffirming his commitment to preserving the Second Amendment.
The Debate Over Gun-Free Zones
Proponents of the bill argue that “gun-free zones” create soft targets for mass shooters. They suggest that armed civilians could more effectively deter or stop attacks than waiting for law enforcement to arrive. The Crime Prevention Research Center has published data supporting these views, citing multiple incidents where legally armed bystanders intervened during active shootings.
On the other hand, a study from UC Davis suggests the opposite. Researchers found no evidence that gun-free zones attract shooters and concluded such areas may reduce the likelihood of casualties during violent events.
Legislative Outlook
Florida lawmakers continue to debate the merits of Senate Bill 7034, as emotional testimonies from FSU students and gun rights activists shape the narrative. While supporters argue it defends constitutional freedoms, opponents stress that it does nothing to address systemic issues like mental health and easy access to firearms.
As the legislative process unfolds, the bill’s passage or rejection will reflect Florida’s broader stance on gun control and public safety—issues increasingly tested by the reality of mass shootings and the polarized debate surrounding the Second Amendment.
