Global leaders condemn Trump’s controversial plan for U.S. takeover of Gaza Strip, citing potential violations of international law and human rights.
At a Glance
- Trump proposes U.S. control of Gaza Strip and resettlement of Palestinians
- UN, Germany, Turkey, and others label the plan as unacceptable and illegal
- Concerns raised about potential disruption of cease-fire and two-state solution
- Plan faces opposition from both international community and moderate Israelis
- Experts warn of unrealistic implementation and potential regional instability
Global Backlash to Trump’s Gaza Proposal
U.S. President Donald Trump’s recent proposal for America to take control of the Gaza Strip has sparked widespread condemnation from global leaders and international organizations. The plan, which involves resettling Palestinians outside of Gaza, has been criticized as a potential violation of international law and human rights.
The United Nations human rights office has stated that the proposed forcible transfer or deportation from occupied territory is prohibited under international humanitarian law. Germany’s Foreign Minister echoed this sentiment, asserting that Gaza belongs to its Palestinian inhabitants.
Regional Reactions and Concerns
Turkey’s Foreign Minister labeled the proposal as “unacceptable,” while Hamas warned it could lead to increased violence. Jordan’s King Abdullah rejected any land annexation or displacement of Palestinians, advocating instead for a two-state solution. The plan has also faced criticism from Arab nations, including those with normalized relations with Israel.
The international community, including France, Saudi Arabia, China, and Russia, has largely criticized the plan, calling for respect for Palestinian rights and a peaceful resolution to the conflict. There are concerns that the proposal could disrupt the fragile cease-fire between Israel and Hamas and hinder efforts to normalize relations between Israel and Saudi Arabia under the Abraham Accords.
Implications for U.S. Policy and Regional Stability
Trump’s proposal marks a potential shift in U.S. policy, which has historically supported a two-state solution since the Oslo Accords. The plan lacks clarity on how the U.S. would assume control or relocate 2.3 million residents, raising questions about its feasibility.
Middle East foreign policy experts consider the plan unworkable and suggest the U.S. reconsider due to strong opposition. The proposal has also raised concerns about the possibility of the U.S. allowing Israeli annexation of the West Bank, which would represent a significant policy change.
While the plan is supported by hard-liners in Israel, it faces opposition from moderates who favor a two-state solution. Opposition leader Yair Lapid warned of unpredictable consequences from the proposal. Palestinian leaders and residents have strongly rejected the idea of forced relocation.
“Trump cannot decide where we will live. We were born in Gaza and only death can take people out of Gaza,” Samir al-Barawi said.
