The Department of Justice now says TikTok is “safe” for federal devices, yet it offers almost no hard proof to back that sweeping claim.
Story Snapshot
- Justice Department says the 2022 federal TikTok ban no longer applies after a new joint venture takes over U.S. operations.
- Federal workers may now download TikTok on government phones and laptops, if their agencies allow it.
- TikTok USDS is majority owned by non‑Chinese investors, but ByteDance still keeps a 19.9% stake in the U.S. business.
- The Justice Department offers no public technical security audit to prove Chinese access and data risks are truly gone.
DOJ Clears TikTok For Federal Devices After Corporate Reshuffle
The United States Department of Justice has issued a memorandum to President Donald Trump declaring that the 2022 ban on TikTok on federal devices no longer applies. The memo says the change is based on ByteDance’s January 2026 deal to move U.S. user data and operations into a new company called TikTok U.S. Data Security Joint Venture LLC, or TikTok USDS. Following that opinion, Trump instructed executive branch agencies that workers may install TikTok on official devices, as long as agencies still apply normal workplace rules.
The Justice Department’s memo goes further than many expected by stating that “the current version of TikTok does not pose risks” to national security. This is a sharp reversal from the 2022 law that banned TikTok on federal devices because of broad concerns over data harvesting, Chinese state access, and algorithm manipulation. The new opinion argues those concerns are resolved mainly because control of U.S. data and operations now sits inside TikTok USDS rather than directly under ByteDance’s Chinese structure.
Inside The TikTok USDS Deal: Who Really Owns And Runs The App?
The TikTok USDS joint venture was created to satisfy the 2024 “divest or ban” law, which forced TikTok to separate its U.S. business from any foreign adversary that held more than 20% ownership. Under the new structure, American and allied investors, including Oracle, Silver Lake, and Abu Dhabi‑based MGX, together control about 80% of the U.S. TikTok entity. ByteDance now holds a 19.9% stake, sitting just under the legal threshold that would have triggered a ban.
Reports say TikTok USDS is tasked with handling U.S. user data, app operations, and the recommendation algorithm for American users. The joint venture stores U.S. data on Oracle’s cloud systems and claims to run “comprehensive data privacy and cybersecurity measures” to keep foreign access out. The new entity’s board is majority American, and an American chief executive officer, Adam Presser, now leads the U.S. operation. On paper, this structure is designed to wall off U.S. data from Beijing and give trusted investors direct control over security.
Big Promises, Thin Proof: Security Questions Conservatives Should Ask
While the Justice Department’s memo leans heavily on this corporate reshuffle, it does not cite any public technical audit, independent forensic review, or red‑team test to prove TikTok is now safe on government hardware. The opinion assumes that changing ownership and moving data to Oracle is enough to erase the original security risks, but it does not address whether TikTok USDS still relies on ByteDance’s code, update systems, or engineering teams. There is no evidence shared about source‑code review, server isolation, or protections against hidden back doors.
Critics point out that ByteDance’s 19.9% stake means the Chinese parent company still has a real financial interest in the U.S. business. The joint venture also licenses TikTok’s core recommendation algorithm from ByteDance, which raises questions about ongoing technical ties. Past reporting has shown that TikTok shared U.S. user data with ByteDance staff even after earlier “security measures” were announced, suggesting that promises alone do not always match practice on the ground. For many national security hawks, these facts make the Justice Department’s blanket “no risk” claim hard to accept without deeper proof.
Congress, Agencies, And Patriots: Next Steps To Protect Data And Devices
For conservatives who value limited government but strong national defense, this move by the Justice Department highlights a familiar pattern: executive lawyers rewriting earlier security rules based on structure changes, not hard technical evidence. Lawmakers in 2022 acted on serious national security warnings when they banned TikTok from federal devices, yet the new memo does not clearly explain how each original threat—data harvesting, foreign influence, and covert surveillance—has been solved one by one. Instead, it treats corporate restructuring itself as proof that the danger is gone.
The Justice Department now allows federal employees to download TikTok on government devices following massive structural changes and security updates.#TikTok #DOJ #CyberSecurity #TechNewshttps://t.co/Hh9G0kHRxn
— Daily CyberSecurity (@Daily_CyberSec) July 18, 2026
Serious oversight steps are available if Congress and concerned citizens choose to push. Legislators can demand a full, independent security audit of TikTok USDS infrastructure by a federally certified firm, including penetration testing to see if foreign actors can still reach U.S. data. They can subpoena TikTok USDS executives and ByteDance engineers to testify under oath about code access, data flows, and update control since January 2026. Freedom of Information Act requests could also expose the Justice Department’s full legal reasoning and any internal technical reviews that supposedly support its “no risk” conclusion.
Sources:
cbsnews.com, detroitnews.com, hk.on.cc, 163.com, jdsupra.com, socialmediatoday.com, newsroom.tiktok.com
















